Earlier this year I had a meeting with Deputy Premier Thomas
Lakaszuk (former Minister of Employment & Immigration) responsible for
Occupational Health and Safety. The meeting was to discuss the state of health
and safety in the province of Alberta. During this meeting he cited the
exemplary safety record of the oil sands as an example for the world to follow
and how well Alberta is doing in this portfolio. He supported his statement based
upon the accident claim history as reported by WCB. Interestingly he is not
wrong “by the numbers” however; he is seriously misinformed on how those
numbers are derived.
WCB is an insurance company and set their rates based upon
risk. In setting up Industry Classification they group employers together with
similar loss expectations. This makes sense as one would expect the
Construction Industry to have higher rates than say Financial Services based purely
upon risk. However when one looks at the WCB rates it creates a head scratching
moment:
Industry
|
Rate Classification Description
|
Rates
|
Oilsands Mining & Processing
|
$0.41
|
|
Hair Salons
|
$0.60
|
|
Disk Jockey
|
$0.66
|
|
Dry Cleaners
|
$1.53
|
|
Camp Catering - Industrial
|
$2.10
|
|
Fruit Farms
|
$2.72
|
|
Suspended Ceiling Installation
|
$4.20
|
This is counterintuitive. Based upon the above one has to
conclude that Disk Jockey industry is 161% more risky than Oilsands Mining and Suspended
Ceiling installation is over a 1000% riskier. Part of the explanation is that
premium rates are also set upon the actual loss experience. However for these
numbers to then make sense one would have to believe that Hair Salons etc. are
having more injury incidents and are not effectively managing their claims. This
would effectively impact industry rates higher. Perhaps an examination of similar
risk industries that are highly regulated with implemented Safety and WCB Management
Systems provides a better comparison:
Industry
|
Rate Classification Description
|
2013 Rates
|
Oilsands Mining & Processing
|
$0.41
|
|
Coal Mining – Open Pit
|
$1.44
|
|
Construction General Industrial
|
$1.62
|
|
Contract Plant Maintenance
|
$1.62
|
Open Pit Coal Mining provides the best comparison both from
a risk and management perspective yet, Coal Mining is over 350% higher. The
difference is that within Oilsands Mining operations there is an extraordinary reliance
on the use of subcontractors for engaging in high risk work. It is not that
there are fewer accidents or that they are even being better managed. What is
happening is that when an incident occurs with a subcontractor that incident is
being assigned to the Contract Plant Maintenance and General Industrial
Construction industry accounts. If one included the subcontractors as part of
the Oilsands Industry one can easily conclude that Open Pit Coal Mining is more
safe that Oilsands Operations. This is a more accurate depiction given inherent
risk of work and actual loss experience.
So Deputy Premier Lakaszuk a bit of advice. If something
appears to be counter-intuitive do a bit more digging. It is worthwhile to
maintain your credibility and to avoid looking ill informed.
No comments:
Post a Comment